G e moore biography of alberta

Moore G. Powered by CITE. Discuss this G. Notify me of new comments via email. Cancel Report. Create a new account. More From encyclopedia. Updated Aug 24 About encyclopedia. George David Birkhoff.

G e moore biography of alberta: Biography. George was born in Death.

George D. George Creel. George Cooper Stevens. George Cheyne. George Charles de Hevesy. George Caspar Homans. George C. Wallace Community College: Tabular Data. Wallace Community College: Narrative Description. Marshall Foundation. George Boole and the Algebra of Logic. George Bernard Dantzig. George Bentham. George Balanchine's The Nutcracker.

George B. George Armstrong Custer Court-Martial: George Anson. Moore contended that goodness cannot be analysed in terms of any other property. In Principia Ethicahe writes:.

G e moore biography of alberta: Introduction | On August 22 ,

Therefore, we cannot define 'good' by explaining it in other words. We can only indicate a thing or an action and say "That is good". Similarly, we cannot describe to a person born totally blind exactly what yellow is. We can only show a sighted person a piece of yellow paper or a yellow scrap of cloth and say "That is yellow". In addition to categorising 'good' as indefinable, Moore also emphasized that it is a non-natural property.

This means that it cannot be empirically or scientifically tested or verified—it is not analyzable by "natural science". As a result of his opinion, he has often been described by later writers as an advocate of ethical intuitionism. Moore, however, wished to distinguish his opinions from the opinions usually described as "Intuitionist" when Principia Ethica was written:.

In order to express the fact that ethical propositions of my first class [propositions about what is good as an end in itself] are incapable of proof or disproof, I have sometimes followed Sidgwick's usage in calling them 'Intuitions. Sidgwick himself seems never to have been clearly aware of the immense importance of the difference which distinguishes his Intuitionism from the common doctrine, which has generally been called by that name.

The Intuitionist proper is distinguished by maintaining that propositions of my second class—propositions which assert that a certain action is right or a duty —are incapable of proof or disproof by any enquiry into the results of such actions. I, on the contrary, am no less anxious to maintain that propositions of this kind are not 'Intuitions,' than to maintain that propositions of my first class are Intuitions.

Moore distinguished his view from the opinion of deontological intuitionists, who claimed that "intuitions" could determine questions about what actions are right or required by duty. According to Moore, "intuitions" revealed not the rightness or wrongness of specific actions, but only what items were good in themselves, as ends to be pursued. Moore holds that right actions are those producing the most good.

Because of this, Moore suggests that the definition of duty is limited to what generally produces better results than probable alternatives in a comparatively near future.

G e moore biography of alberta: Arthur Henry Cornish. Stuart and Mary

One of the most important parts of Moore's philosophical development was his differing with the idealism that dominated British philosophy as represented by the works of his former teachers F. Bradley and John McTaggartand his defence of what he regarded as a "common sense" type of realism. In his essay " A Defence of Common Sense ", he argued against idealism and scepticism toward the external world, on the grounds that they could not give reasons to accept that their metaphysical premises were more plausible than the reasons we have for accepting the common sense claims about our knowledge of the world, which sceptics and idealists must deny.

He famously put the point into dramatic relief with his essay "Proof of an External World", in which he gave a common sense argument against scepticism by raising his right hand and saying "Here is one hand" and then raising his left and saying "And here is another", then concluding that there are at least two external objects in the world, and therefore that he knows by this argument that an external world exists.

Not surprisingly, not everyone preferring sceptical doubts found Moore's method of argument entirely convincing; Moore, however, defends his argument on the grounds that sceptical arguments seem invariably to require an appeal to "philosophical intuitions" that we have considerably less reason to accept than we have for the common sense claims that they supposedly refute.

The "Here is one hand" argument also influenced Ludwig Wittgensteinwho spent his last years working out a new method for Moore's argument in the remarks that were published posthumously as On Certainty. Moore is also remembered for drawing attention to the peculiar inconsistency involved in uttering a sentence such as "It is raining, but I do not believe it is raining", a puzzle now commonly termed " Moore's paradox ".

The puzzle is that it seems inconsistent for anyone to assert such a sentence; but there doesn't seem to be any logical contradiction between "It is raining" and "I don't believe that it is raining", because the former is a statement about the weather and the latter a statement about a person's belief about the weather, and it is perfectly logically possible that it may rain whilst a person does not believe that it is raining.

In addition to Moore's own work on the paradox, the puzzle also inspired a great deal of work by Ludwig Wittgensteinwho described the paradox as the most impressive philosophical insight that Moore had ever introduced. It is said [ by whom? Moore's description of the principle of the organic whole is extremely straightforward, nonetheless, and a variant on a pattern that began with Aristotle:.

According to Moore, a moral actor cannot survey the 'goodness' inherent in the various parts of a situation, assign a value to each of them, and then generate a sum in order to get an idea of its total value. A moral scenario is a complex assembly of parts, and its total value is often created by the relations between those parts, and not by their individual value.

The organic metaphor is thus very appropriate: biological organisms seem to have emergent properties which cannot be found anywhere in their individual parts. For example, a human brain seems to exhibit a capacity for thought when none of its neurons exhibit any such capacity. In the same way, a moral scenario can have a value different than the sum of its component parts.

To understand the application of the organic principle to questions of value, it is perhaps best to consider Moore's primary example, that of a consciousness experiencing a beautiful object.

G e moore biography of alberta: Years Between the Rivers: A

To see how the principle works, a thinker engages in "reflective isolation", the act of isolating a given concept in a kind of null context and determining its intrinsic value. In our example, we can easily see that, of themselves, beautiful objects and consciousnesses are not particularly valuable things. They might have some value, but when we consider the total value of a consciousness experiencing a beautiful object, it seems to exceed the simple sum of these values.

Hence the value of a whole must not be assumed to be the same as the sum of the values of its parts. Contents move to sidebar hide. Article Talk. Read Edit View history. Tools Tools. Download as PDF Printable version. In other projects. Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Wikidata item. English philosopher — For the cofounder of Intel, see Gordon Moore.

Moore had a passion for clarity and propriety of usage; he also insisted on the rights of common sense, not as the ultimate norm but as one important basis for criticism, not to be lightly dismissed. After retirement Moore lectured widely in the United States until He died on Oct. Email Print. Read more. Latest headlines. Looking for someone?